Showing posts with label integrity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label integrity. Show all posts

Wednesday, February 22, 2012

George Washington


He declined the monarchy while Obama seeks to install it.

George Washington
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This is a good article. Click here for more information.
Page semi-protected
George Washington
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/1/12/Gilbert_Stuart%2C_George_Washington_%28Lansdowne_portrait%2C_1796%29.jpg/220px-Gilbert_Stuart%2C_George_Washington_%28Lansdowne_portrait%2C_1796%29.jpg
In office
April 30, 1789* – March 4, 1797
Vice President
Preceded by
Position established
Succeeded by
John Adams
In office
July 13, 1798 – December 14, 1799
Appointed by
John Adams
Preceded by
Succeeded by
Commander-in-Chief
of the Continental Army
In office
June 15, 1775 – December 23, 1783
Appointed by
Preceded by
Position established
Succeeded by
In office
May 10, 1775 – June 15, 1775
Preceded by
Position established
Succeeded by
Delegate to the
First Continental Congress
from Virginia
In office
September 5, 1774 – October 26, 1774
Preceded by
Position established
Succeeded by
Position abolished
Personal details
Born
February 22, 1732(1732-02-22)
Westmoreland, Virginia Colony
Died
December 14, 1799(1799-12-14) (aged 67)
Mount Vernon, Virginia, U.S.
Political party
Spouse(s)
Profession
Planter
Officer
Religion
Signature
Cursive signature in ink
Military service
Allegiance
Kingdom of Great BritainGreat Britain
United StatesUnited States
Service/branch
Virginia provincial militia
Continental Army
United States Army
Years of service
Militia: 1752–1758
Continental Army: 1775–1783
Army: 1798–1799
Rank
Commands
Battles/wars
Awards
*March 4 is the official start of the first presidential term. April 6 is when Congress counted the votes of the Electoral College and certified a president. April 30 is when Washington was sworn in.
George Washington (February 22, 1732 [O.S. February 11, 1731] [1731 in Annunciation Style of enumerating years]—December 14, 1799) was the first President of the United States of America, serving from 1789 to 1797, and dominant military and political leader of the United States from 1775 to 1799. He led the American victory over Great Britain in the American Revolutionary War as commander-in-chief of the Continental Army from 1775 to 1783, and presided over the writing of the Constitution in 1787. Washington became the first president by unanimous choice, and oversaw the creation of a strong, well-financed national government that maintained neutrality in the wars raging in Europe, suppressed rebellion and won acceptance among Americans of all types. His leadership style established many forms and rituals of government that have been used since, such as using a cabinet system and delivering an inaugural address. Washington is universally regarded as the "Father of his country".
Washington was born into the provincial gentry of a wealthy, well-connected Colonial Virginia family who owned tobacco plantations and slaves. After both his father and older brother died young, Washington became personally and professionally attached to the powerful William Fairfax, who promoted his career as a surveyor and soldier. Washington quickly became a senior officer in the colonial forces during the first stages of the French and Indian War. Chosen by the Second Continental Congress in 1775 to be commander-in-chief of the Continental Army in the American Revolution, Washington managed to force the British out of Boston in 1776, but was defeated and almost captured later that year when he lost New York City. After crossing the Delaware River in the dead of winter, he defeated the British in two battles, retook New Jersey and restored momentum to the Patriot cause. Because of his strategy, Revolutionary forces captured two major British armies at Saratoga in 1777 and Yorktown in 1781. Historians laud Washington for his selection and supervision of his generals, encouragement of morale and ability to hold together the army, coordination with the state governors and state militia units, relations with Congress and attention to supplies, logistics, and training. In battle, however, Washington was repeatedly outmaneuvered by British generals with larger armies. After victory had been finalized in 1783, Washington resigned rather than seize power, proving his opposition to dictatorship and his commitment to American republicanism. He retired from the presidency in 1797 and returned to his home, Mount Vernon, and his domestic life where he managed a variety of enterprises. He freed all his slaves by his final 1799 will.
Dissatisfied with the weaknesses of Articles of Confederation, in 1787 Washington presided over the Constitutional Convention that drafted the United States Constitution. Elected as the first President of the United States in 1789, he attempted to bring rival factions together to unify the nation. He supported Alexander Hamilton's programs to pay off all state and national debt, to implement an effective tax system and to create a national bank (despite opposition from Thomas Jefferson). Washington proclaimed the U.S. neutral in the wars raging in Europe after 1793. He avoided war with Great Britain and guaranteed a decade of peace and profitable trade by securing the Jay Treaty in 1795, despite intense opposition from the Jeffersonians. Although never officially joining the Federalist Party, he supported its programs. Washington's "Farewell Address" was an influential primer on republican virtue and a warning against partisanship, sectionalism, and involvement in foreign wars.
Washington had a vision of a great and powerful nation that would be built on republican lines using federal power. He sought to use the national government to preserve liberty, improve infrastructure, open the western lands, promote commerce, found a permanent capital, reduce regional tensions and promote a spirit of American nationalism.[2] At his death, Washington was hailed as "first in war, first in peace, and first in the hearts of his countrymen".[3] The Federalists made him the symbol of their party but for many years, the Jeffersonians continued to distrust his influence and delayed building the Washington Monument. As the leader of the first successful revolution against a colonial empire in world history, Washington became an international icon for liberation and nationalism, especially in France and Latin America.[4] He is consistently ranked among the top three presidents of the United States, according to polls of both scholars and the general public

Happy birth anniversary, Mr. President.



Monday, February 20, 2012

Long Knives


Some Native American tribes referred to the U.S. cavalry as “long knives” because they carried swords or sabers. The modern version of a long knife is a politician who claims to represent a certain collection of principles but violates them time after time. He or she is guilty of knifing the gullible constituents in the back. To be candid the mortal wounds are not always the fault of the weasel-like politician. Sometimes the voters just “assume” that a candidate accepts their point of view and fail to properly examine the leader wannabe. The real knife wielders do talk the talk, but when the constituent is busy living life, the politician inserts the blade, rams it in and twists it.

Learning the lingo of a constituency without sharing its priorities or values is the first step in progressive pandering. As we have noted with Mitt Romney, his mastery of the conservative lexicon is lacking, but as the campaign moves forward, his utterances become more palatable to the “base.” He is learning the language and they are ignoring the obvious. We are facing the same stage, same play with different actors. The script is constant, and in our theater of campaign drama we ruefully anticipate the final scene as the big government statists and the latest version of “political wonder-boy” gleefully shove the shivs into our self-deluded backs. Each presentation ends the same. As the curtain falls, we stagger in disbelief that we’ve been misled once again. The searing pain from the knife becomes dull as we ponder how did this happen again?   

Admittedly the loosely defined conservative coalition of the GOP has struggled to unite behind a single anti-Establishment, anti-Mitt candidate. The difficulty was that each pretender was overloaded with baggage of varying kinds. Newt’s burden is himself….his personal life, his caustic persona and his flighty inconsistency. Rick Santorum’s steadfast message is appealing to many, but his statist, big government approach and his self-righteous sermonizing turns others away. Dr. Paul (choose one or more of the following complaints) is too old, too non-glamorous, too cranky, too wacko on foreign affairs or (the BIG ONE) too unelectable. It’s odd that many criticize Congressman Paul for his apparent appeal among independents and young people yet believe that the eventual GOP nominee must moderate in order to win independent voters. Can you say cognitive dissonance? Can you say hypocrisy? Can you say philosophical confusion?

Since the beginning of our Republic and its devolution into the “factions” that President Washington decried in his farewell address, we have struggled to hold onto the dream envisioned by the Founders and Framers. The Federalists and Anti-Federalists, Democratic Republicans, Whigs and a host of others have labored to capture their interpretations of the vision. In addition….each faction or party has undergone its own internal battles for purity of message and intensity of purpose. We should understand by this point in our national development that we cannot find the perfect party, candidate or office holder who represents each of our preferences, principles or priorities. Even when we join together for a common purpose, we drift apart because of significant differences and opinions. Our political history illustrates that, at some level, we have maintained our individuality…our uniqueness as children of God and inheritors of liberty. Isn’t it reasonable, therefore, that our closest “ideal” party, candidate or office holder should be one who honors and defends our individual liberty? Why bother trying to form expedient coalitions that are doomed to disintegrate? Why not support those political and social entities that are committed to our personal freedom? It seems that as we strive to unite under false colors, we are merely postponing the eventual dissolution of our weak alliances. We are kicking the can of inevitability down the road with no solid underlying justification for doing so.

As our nation races closer to irrelevance, we may believe that we hear the bugle in the distance as the cavalry rides to rescue our nation from its precarious position. The long knives are coming….just in time to save us from ourselves and our collapse. We must be vigilant, however, that their leader is not the modern-day version of General G.A. Custer and that we have our last stand at Little Big Horn. What is worse…..a knife in the back or an arrow in the heart? The outcomes are the same, but it may be better to die with honor than to suffer the agony of betrayal.

Tuesday from 6-7:00pm on 1370 WSPD. www.wspd.com