Showing posts with label force. Show all posts
Showing posts with label force. Show all posts

Friday, March 30, 2012

Holding the Handle


These columns and others by astute observers have summarized many problems that our nation is facing. At times it seems as if the difficulties are so numerous that we can’t resolve them all. We can’t seem “to get a handle” on our current situation because it’s too difficult to grasp. Fiscal, social, economic and political problems are overwhelming us. Although each issue may appear to stand alone, they are all inter-related and interconnected. The linkage is rather clear if one lifts the hood and peeks underneath it. Just as health issues in one part of the human body can impact other vital functions, the national sickness is similar.

Clearly if we focus on the issues and problems, we will have to duct tape our heads to stop them from exploding. You can easily observe how broad the scope is for difficulties we face by monitoring your email threads. Every day seems to include a new outrage by the government wherein some typical citizen is abused by either government power or official indifference. I have discovered the secret handle that allows me to deal with all these diverse problems. I have been blessed to “get a handle on the issues.” Strengthen your grip because here we go.

Faith is vital for coping with the numerous wheels that seem to be flying off our nation and our society. The opposite of faith is despair which leads to inertia and passivity. Faith in God, faith in the future, and faith in your fellow patriots are all reservoirs of strength as you confront the chaos. Progressives (socialists, communists, statists) gleefully demean people of faith while at the same time failing to understand that their baseless hope in the power and beneficence of government is also faith-based. Sometimes it appears that their faith exceeds ours because they never quit despite numerous examples of the failure of their faith in government.

Freedom is the cornerstone of the handle….the glue that holds it together. While faith is necessary for life, freedom is critical for living. One must have the maneuverability to react to circumstances, and flexibility is nearly impossible when one’s freedom to think, to act and to organize has been severely curtailed by the state or social convention. We have witnessed that freedom is fleeting and becomes more endangered every day. So, we must positively capitalize on our remaining freedom to sound the alarms for our communities and our loved ones. Some of us have a tendency to under-estimate our freedom and resist “making waves,” but we’ll never get the envelope to the intended recipient if we are too timid to push it. Movements are started and expanded as more people choose to exercise their freedom.

Fidelity is a derivative of faith, but in the context of a crumbling nation, it references trust and loyalty. It is important that we not get caught-up in the movement and superficially support positions that we may not hold dear. During the past few years of my efforts for liberty, I have encountered legions of people who give lip service to freedom and constitutional government yet…at crunch time they are unwilling to let go of certain programs or big-government policies. Their faltering attitudes undermine the movement and diminish the impact because the numbers of supporters are not real. They are imaginary.
Before committing your “lives, fortunes and sacred honor” to a movement be absolutely certain that you have thought through the positions and will stand for its principles….despite fierce opposition.

Force is a fundamental aspect of societies and nations. Force is the primary tool of government to assure compliance with the various rules and laws of the community, state or nation. Our Framers understood that government embodied force as the basic component for implementing its policies and programs. Invariably the force of the government conflicts with the liberty of the individual which is why our wise designers sought to limit the size and reach of government. When governments exceed their legitimate purposes and become oppressive, the people may have to resort to force to reinstitute their basic liberties. Force should always be the last resort because by its very nature, it is destructive. When the power of the state grows too large, legitimate measures for correction are often ineffective. The state will either co-opt the dissenting movement with false promises or forcibly crush it. Force is part of the “handle” because the restorers should understand its importance to the government and the potential necessity for using it to recapture the Founding dream. Force should be avoided whenever possible, but astute patriots will always be aware of its presence and be prepared to utilize it when necessary. They key word is “prepared.” Force should not be the product of mob frenzy, but should only be judiciously employed as a last resort.

Faith, freedom, fidelity and force can be valuable tools for coping with the surrounding chaos if we work for the best and are prepared for the worst. It is absolutely critical that each of us look inward and precisely define our limits and our visions. Failure to do so will lead to tragedy.



Tuesday, March 22, 2011

Why Libya?


In 1785 Thomas Jefferson and John Adams convened a negotiating session in London with the Ambassador from Tripoli about the unwarranted raiding of United States merchant ships and the capturing of U.S citizens for slavery. The Ambassador informed them that because the sailors from America were not followers of the Qur’an, they were open to plunder and slavery. After Jefferson became President, he took action to quell the threat from the Barbary pirates.


This past week President Obama went along with a UN directive promoted by France and Great Britain to enforce a “no fly zone” over Tunisia. It was characterized as a humanitarian effort to save the lives of Tunisians who were protesting and rebelling against Colonel Gaddafi’s dictatorial rule. Although the total extent of the U.S. involvement has not been revealed or leaked, there are strong indications and intelligence that our B-2 bombers were deployed.

At this point we continue to have major deployments in Iraq and Afghanistan. Our military has more than 900 bases in 136 countries across the globe. Our professional fighting forces have been stretched so thin that National Guard and military reserves are serving multiple tours in the various hotspots identified by the nation’s political leadership. In some respects we have come to be known as bellicose bullies while, at the same time, displaying weakness with true threats to our national security. Iran and North Korea have both stated a willingness to do harm to our country and its people, yet their positions as nuclear powers and rogue states remain relatively unchallenged by our leadership. This current state of affairs is not limited to golfing/basketball-player/bracket-creating Democrats. It has existed for some time under presidents from both of the old parties.

In my gut I believe that our political leaders who have not served in armed conflict use these meaningless, unconstitutional adventurous forays as bona fides for establishing their “tough guy” images. This attitude has been prevalent for a long time. In 1898 Teddy Roosevelt formed his own military force and charged up San Juan Hill against a few poorly-armed peasants to prove that he had the courage, the dash and the leadership qualities to be a leader. He was elected to the presidency two years later and served for two terms (he was instrumental in the first great federal land grab). Ronald Reagan ordered the invasion of Grenada, and the invasion of Panama to capture General Noriega was authorized by George H. W. Bush.  President Clinton endorsed General Wesley Clark’s 30,000 foot high military intervention in Bosnia to minimize ethnic cleansing by bombing civilians and the Chinese Embassy.

Tunisia and Gaddafi have been pesky irritants for some time for the United States. In 1986 President Reagan ordered a bombing of Gaddafi’s private complex near Tunis, and one of his children was killed. On December 21, 1988, Pan Am 103 was blown out of the sky over Lockerbie, Scotland, and 259 people perished. It was suspected and recently confirmed that Gaddafi ordered the “hit” in retaliation for the 1986 raid. For as long as the United States has existed as a nation, the Barbary, Tripoli/Tunisian region has been a problem area.

So in the midst of fine dining, dancing the bosa nova, and attempting to appear “presidential,” President Obama has approved another military intervention in Tunisia. Despite his differences from his predecessors, his actions and his rhetoric copy theirs. If humanitarian concerns were his driving impulse, then the Sudan and Rwanda would emerge as theaters of operation. The people who have served in the halls of power for our country may reflect different philosophies, different domestic policies and varying political skills. They all share a common trait, however. They undermine our liberty, plunder our property and steal our wealth while risking the lives of our professional military personnel, spending borrowed money for ordinance and deployment, and behaving like the tin-pot dictators that they claim to oppose. The fault is ours, fellow citizens, for electing the weak to lead us. The Lord said the meek would inherit the earth. The meek are humble. The weak are dangerous.

Why Libya? Why now? Why at all? Why attack countries which have the military might, the GDP and the geo-political power of Rhode Island? Isn’t it forays such as these that lead to our being labeled an international bully? What purpose do we serve by projecting our national power in places such as these? Or…are they mere exercises in the exhibition of presidential personal testosterone? Lord Acton was correct. “Absolute power does corrupt absolutely.”