Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Congress. Show all posts

Wednesday, March 14, 2012

FED Up


At a basic level the idea of a central bank and clearinghouse for the United States of America makes sense. It seems apparent that big banks, medium-sized banks and small banks will from time to time need a ready supply of cash to offset short-term or momentary needs. Just as many retailers rely on wholesalers to stock and supply their products, a bank accepts deposits and loans money at a profitable rate of interest. Their cash reserves rarely equal their deposit totals, so they may find themselves short of cash even with an outstanding portfolio of performing loans. It should be apparent, however, that the Federal Reserve Bank has abused its charter and its purpose. It has become a tool of the government and global banking interests.

The elementary problem with the FED as it has been designed is that Congress has subordinated its constitutional responsibility for the coining (printing) and valuing our money to a consortium of private bankers. Odd isn’t it that despite all the overreaching by government into the private sector, it is a constitutionally mandated role or obligation that Congress chose to privatize? Why banking? Why money? The entire FED revolves around debt. As money is loaned out by individual banks, they go to the FED to restore their reserves. The FED must print the money and LOAN it to the banks. Without debt the FED would not have a real function other than the constitutional coinage one that Congress gave to it. So the bottom line is that the powers for printing money and creating debt reside with a cabal of private mega-bankers. Cheery thought, huh? You might ask “how do they create debt?” When a bank seeks additional funds for loaning, the FED creates it digitally. In other words if the local banks didn’t have the funds for additional lending, borrowers would have to go elsewhere for funds but the money supply would be more stable.

The unceasing printing (digitizing) of money expands our indebtedness and our money supply…thus generating de facto inflation. Without a corresponding surge in production of goods and services every dollar created increases the number of dollars ‘chasing” a finite supply of products or labor. More dollars chasing fewer things means higher costs. Increasing debt and inflated/lower-valued money are not recipes for a prosperous nation. In the short-term inflation may lull the unsuspecting into assuming that prosperity is flourishing, but will have the opposite effect after a time as goods and property become more difficult to purchase because of escalated prices and higher interest rates.

The FED because it is private uses the resources and wealth of the United States as its own “net worth” as it props up other national currencies and governments. The value of the dollar is directly related to the productivity of the United States, the number of dollars in circulation and the confidence that the indebtedness will be repaid. If any of those three factors experience some slippage, the corresponding effect will negatively impact the U. S. economy. If any of the three major factors underperforms, the government must collect additional revenue to maintain some level of equilibrium to avoid massive runaway inflation, excessive interest costs or severe reductions in productivity. Thus, the FED with full compliance from the government through its policies practically insures higher levels of taxation for American taxpayers. Taxes collected through force are theft. Taxes that stifle economies and intrude on individual freedom are tyrannical. Because of its power over our productivity, our indebtedness and our money supply, the FED, in effect, controls our economy. Our government increasingly controls our lives, and the Federal Reserve manipulates our livelihoods.

It should be dawning on you that as debt problems increase, taxes go up. When interest rates begin to ratchet upward due to inflated money driving the cost of borrowing higher, the governments’ needs for debt service will grow astronomically, the resultant tax increases will stifle the economy and higher taxes plus lower economic productivity joined with massive debt leads to catastrophe. It is an inescapable cycle that can at the best be postponed for a while but becomes worse during the delay. In their efforts to manipulate the market, the currency and debt, the FED will create economic bubbles that will enlarge and eventually burst. As the FED scheme and rig the system, shrewd investors will seek other avenues for avoiding the FED action….thus the bubbles will be created.

Compounding the problem of the FED’s unhealthy and unconstitutional control of the basics of our fiscal and economic systems is the fact that they operate with impunity. We the people have no standing to audit the Federal Reserve or to insist on transparent accountability. In 1913 Congress handed the keys and the car to the Wall Street manipulators and self-serving big bankers. Now Congress lacks the courage to reclaim its constitutional duty yet continues to meddle in a plethora of other unconstitutional arenas. We are now on the precipice of economic collapse. Although the nation and its people will suffer, you can wager your home and all your worldly goods that the Fed governors, their favored bankers and career politicians will emerge unscathed. Obviously….I’m FED Up.



  

Saturday, March 3, 2012

Littlestuff Weekender-3-3-2012


Washington State is caucusing on Saturday, and ten states will be selecting delegates while choosing their presidential preferences on Super Tuesday. Perhaps the race for the GOP nomination will become much clearer….perhaps not.

Meanwhile….Germany announced that Greece can either accept the austerity measures mandated by the EU or resign from the European Union. If neither of those actions is undertaken, Germany says it may withdraw from the mega-state. In my view that’s unlikely and business will go on as usual until we have a severe European economic collapse followed by global economic devastation reminiscent of the sound of clicking dominoes as they tumble down.

Sheriff Joe Arpaio announced that forensic evidence proved that President Obama’s “birth certificate” was fraudulent. Obama’s defenders remarked that the ‘copy’ was not an original, therefore likely to be considered a counterfeit. The President laughed and his minions are still pursuing the sheriff for a number of “violations” of federal law regarding treatment of prisoners.

Toledo City Council decides to spend significantly more than $700 thousand to install cameras to observe perpetrators as they commit crimes in Toledo. Meanwhile there’s a shortage of police and cash in Toledo…..as well as common sense. Big Brother lives in Toledo….which is a good thing because others are moving out. The good news is that the videos can be uploaded to You Tube and people throughout the world can laugh at the brazenness of Toledo criminals and the ineffectiveness of Toledo’s finest to prevent their activity.

The conference tournaments are almost underway as we merrily trip into March Madness. As a sports fan, I typically limit my viewing/listening to teams that I care about or follow. March Madness is different. If I have time, I will watch two unknown teams from “directional” (NW, SE, Western, Eastern, Northern etc.) universities play 40 minutes of sloppy basketball. I will dutifully fill my brackets for my son-in-law’s contest and silently contribute my $10. If the pattern from previous years holds true, I will be one of the leaders in the first two rounds and will finish far out of the pack by the completion of the NCAA tournament.

Yesterday (Friday March 2nd) Pat and I had our 43rd wedding anniversary. I feel especially blessed that she has been so willing to suffer by staying with me all these years. I know that she could have done better, and I know that my ranting and complaining may have become tiresome for her. She has hung in there for more than four decades and deserves a medal plus the eternal reward that she has been promised and will surely redeem.

Going to an auction today (Saturday). It is 35 degrees and windy. Maybe the weather will discourage other bidders or they’ll show up because it is too miserable to do anything else.

There hasn’t been much publicity surrounding Tea Party challengers to incumbent Congress members of either old fossilized party. Has the focus on the presidential race taken the wind from the sales of local groups? Or are they finding it difficult to attract good candidates who are willing to take on the high-dollar P.R. machines of the current office holders? Given how much energy was lost following the 2010 election, I expected Tea Party, liberty and patriots groups to come back with fire in their eyes this year. Of the 83 or so T.P. candidates elected last cycle only about 20 of them held fast when Boehner and the leadership twisted their arms. Without more new people to help out, those remaining 20 may backslide because Washington D.C. can be a lonely place if your leadership is angry with you. Win the state legislatures and nullify unconstitutional federal meddling then run things constitutionally at home.

The Republican strategy is rather apparent. They didn’t initiate anything of true significance so they wouldn’t anger portions of the population. They hope to win the Senate, but I truly doubt their courage will increase. Unless there is a Republican or third-party President who is ABSOLUTELY COMMITTED to down-sizing government, massively cutting spending and restoring individual liberty, the Congress will not lead and it will be business as usual. The only appreciable change will be the rhetoric as they adjust their words to stop us from charging the Capitol with pitchforks and torches. We’ll be fooled again.

Have a great first weekend of March. Now I will enjoy my prime rib/hashbrown breakfast (leftovers from dinner) before leaving for the auction.

  

Monday, November 14, 2011

Balanced but not Equal


Until recent times every American student has learned the axiom of United States’ constitutional government that our 3-headed federal construct is limited by checks and balances built into the system. The three branches—executive, legislative and judicial—exercise certain powers and oversights that in theory offset one another. Many people err, however, when they consider the branches equal. They are not. For example the shoe and the foot are both larger than the pebble, but the tiny stone in the boot can make walking an uncomfortable undertaking. Two entities do not have to be equal in order for one to judiciously restrict the other. The three federal branches have different functions, constitutional powers, and responsibilities. They are not equal. One of the great distortions of the Twentieth Century was the emergence of the courts as power players in the national arena. Their portfolio for cases brought before them is to determine if matters of law were applied correctly so that plaintiffs and defendants could rely on a just system.

My description of the legal system will not be found in Black’s or Blackstone. It is simply my interpretation of The Constitution of the United States of America and its recognition of the necessity for a system of courts to oversee disputes between citizens and confrontations between citizens and governments. This piece is a perception rather than a précis. In my view there appear to be three primary determinants for identifying the relative power of a branch of government: the constituency, its role, available remedies for enforcing its actions. For example, the President is the Commander-in-Chief of the Armed Forces and the Secretary of Defense is a cabinet level position in the Executive Branch. The people and the various electors choose the President who appoints the Secretary of Defense…subject to Senate confirmation. The House of Representatives is responsible for funding the military, but is not constrained by the desires of the President or his SecDef. In essence, the President has, subject to the War Powers Act and posse comitatus limitations, the entire military apparatus plus various federal agencies with police power to enforce the law. The Congress does hold the “power of the purse,” and the Courts have the force of decree but must rely on voluntary compliance because the courts have no police or military power.

Historically, in my view, there have been two great shifts in the balance of power among the three branches. The 1803 case, Marbury vs. Madison, established the notion of judicial review and the Supreme Court’s authority for determining the constitutionality of legislation and executive actions. Prior to this ruling the Court was viewed as a mere dispute-resolution mechanism. The other action that I believe transformed the balance of power was the ratification of the Seventeenth Amendment which altered the method for selecting U.S. senators from being appointed by their respective state legislatures to direct popular vote by the citizens of each state. The former constituents for senators were THE STATES. The amendment changed their obligations and loyalties to a more populism-oriented constituency. Surely there are additional developments that have altered the delicate balance envisioned by the Framers, but I suspect these two would make the “Power Shifting Hall of Fame.”

Even now with the additional power for the Supreme Court and the alteration of the senators’ fidelity, I believe the House of Representatives remains as the most powerful portion of the federal government … if the country follows constitutional law. Controlling the financial elements for most of the federal government should give the House extraordinary leverage for determining the policies and direction of the nation. As the direct representatives of the people, the House can protect the peoples’ interests from encroachment by the other branches and the bureaucracy. Clearly the House has failed in a number of ways. The House of Representatives with agreement by the Senate has ignored or abrogated some of its constitutional duties by transferring them to other governmental or private sector entities thus minimizing its oversight capabilities. The House has ignored its fiscal responsibilities by over spending and through massive borrowing to fund unconstitutional programs, departments, agencies and bureaus.

We have had inter-branch faceoffs in the past as one branch or another sought to increase its power or to preserve its niche. Some have been ugly, and others were subtle, but the bottom line is that the 3 branches of our federal government are NOT equal. If our federal government were operating in a constitutionally pure manner, the House would be the most powerful entity in the federal government because of its fiscal control. It’s true that the Congress cannot lower the pay of the sitting federal judges, but they can abolish and/or create federal circuits and judgeships at will. This, in effect, allows the Congress to rein in a runaway judiciary. Congress can refuse to fund various and sundry executive branch department, and thus, render them useless. Some people fear the power of the purse that is given to the “Peoples’ House,” but a dispute or confrontation between branches of government is to be preferred to all of them vigorously defending the government’s interests…..as they do now. We need balance. We do not need equality among the branches. In fact we need balance and counterbalance.

Radio this week: Tue. & Wed., 6-7:00pm, 1370 WSPD
                              Friday, 3-6:00pm for Brian Wilson, www.wspd.com
     

Saturday, October 29, 2011

Littlestuff Weekender-10-29-2011


Yesterday I attended Congressman Bob Latta’s (R-OH5) town hall meeting about agriculture. He discussed the likely breakout of the new ag budget/farm bill given the makeup of Congress and the fiscal constraints (odd….that’s never stopped Congress from spending in the past). The operative word for the day was “nutrition.” Bob anticipates that fully 75% of the Agriculture Budget will be targeted for nutrition programs….food stamps, Women infants children (WIC), and other similar government giveaways. The reason that those items remain in the ag budget is to ensure the votes from urban representatives. I understand, but since when should the bribe or the cost of the vote be three times the actual amount dedicated to agriculture?

Certainly as a strict constitutionalist, I am philosophically opposed to any direct government involvement in agriculture. Subsidies and direct payments should be phased out, and the market should be unfettered to provide a more realistic basis for the true cost of food and fiber. On the other hand, if our economically-challenged legislative cowards continue to underwrite other economic sectors and individuals belonging to “distressed” groups, then let’s continue to fund conservation efforts and crop insurance for our agricultural producers. If we continue to borrow obscene amounts of money to fund questionable and unconstitutional programs, we may as well continue assisting the 2% of our population who feeds and clothes us. Finally, one could argue that food and fiber production are vital national security interests. You can figure out why I wrote that.

Anecdotally, it seems to me that the agricultural sector has been more prone to bubbles and busts over the past several decades than have other economic sectors. Extreme weather often leads to inflated prices for crops and produce, and the agricultural community faces weather-based disaster on a regular basis. Early frost damages citrus, excessive rain may retard corn planting or harvesting, severe drought destroys crops, hayfields and pastures, and bitterly cold winters with minimal snow cover can negatively impact the winter wheat crop. Every weather phenomenon that damages urban areas can be as deadly for agriculture, but because of the broad acreage and sparser population, the losses go relatively unreported.

Briefly, I did have a moment to discuss the critical status of Lake Erie with the Congressman, and will continue to stay in touch as we pursue state-driven remedies as opposed to allowing the feds to mess it up. It’s time for Ohio and other Great Lakes states plus our neighbors in Canada to step up and resolve the issues ourselves and for the benefits of OUR CITIZENS…..

We have slightly more than a week until Election Day here in Ohio. Many of our local communities have offices up for consideration as do school boards, and other boards and commissions. Three statewide issues dominate the Buckeye electoral scene….especially Issues 2 and 3. Issue 2 is the ballot effort by public employee unions and their private sector fellow travelers to repeal SB 5….the public employment reform bill. A “yes” vote will continue the effect of the bill, and a “no” vote will repeal it. This issue will be a demonstration of pure electoral power. The outcome will determine the future solvency of the state and most of the local jurisdictions in Ohio. As of 10/27 the repeal effort had spent $17.3 million with another $4+ million on hand. The supporters of retaining the legislation had spent somewhat more than $7 million. It’s a showdown over who is in charge…taxpayers and their elected officials or the unionized public employees. I urge a “YES” vote. If the repeal fails, citizens must hold local officials accountable so that they NEVER AGAIN negotiate to give away the keys to the treasury.

Issue 3 is a constitutional amendment that forbids the state of Ohio from implementing the individual mandate contained in ObamaCare. Without the individual mandate in force, the remainder of that noxious legislative nightmare can be discarded piece by piece. This issue is a showdown between our citizens, state sovereignty and federal over reaching. A “YES” vote will tell the feds to take a hike and prevent the state government from implementing the mandate. Please vote “YES” on Issue 3.

Issue 1 deals with the retirement age for judges. It interests me nearly as much as a bucket of warm spit. I want constitutional judges with sound judgment. I don’t care how old they are as long as they aren’t napping and drooling while on the bench. I’ll probably vote “Yes” because geezers have rights too.

We’ll be on the air Monday night next week because we’re being preempted by the Tuesday night University of Toledo football game and the coach’s show on Wednesday. So to satiate our hordes of eager listeners, management asked us to do our little hour of pot-stirring on Monday, 6-7:00pm, 1370 WSPD, Toledo. Our Monday guest will be James McCall, an independent candidate for President of the United States.  www.wspd.com

Tonight (Saturday) we are going to our son, daughter-in-law and grandson’s home for dinner and the OSU-Wisconsin football game. PJ, Heather and Sully have invited us plus a few of their friends to watch the Buckeyes dismember Bucky Badger.

Please remember…it’s not good parenting to eat all the Reese Cups from your children’s candy haul, and it’s really unfair if you leave them only the candy corn and apples while you greedily munch the remainder.

Mon.6-7:00pm, 1370 WSPD, Toledo.  www.wspd.com