During the day we go through our routines attending to the myriad of details that merge together to form a mini summary of whom we are. The jobs we do the tasks we perform and the people we touch are what will define our lives. The same is true of nations. Were they warlike conquerors? Industrious, prosperous and peaceful? Despotic or tyrannical? Democratic and law-abiding or a democratic anarchic mob? Did they practice “peace through strength” or belligerence through weakness and covetousness? For people as well as nations actions do speak louder than words. What we do and how we act are more illustrative about us than what we say.
Character is sometimes described as the way one behaves when no one is looking. That definition works for nations as well as individuals. Put another way…character is defined by how we act when the revealing sunlight is gone…how we behave after sundown. When we observe a political event on television or in person, we are often prompted by the speaker to celebrate a certain national character. For example when we listen to the President of Iran, Ahmadinejad, during one his tirades, he praises the purity of his nation while denouncing Israel and the United States in apocalyptic terms. Instantly we can assess the character of a country that allows such a hateful person to represent it. We get the sense that the Iranian leadership is unhinged and volatile. People more familiar with the Persian culture caution us that hyperbolic overstatement is a societal norm for the region, and that we should not be too alarmed. Nevertheless our skeptical antennae go up, and our level of mistrust increases because we assume that what is pondered after sundown is much worse than what is openly proclaimed.
Maybe it’s a residue of our staid Victorian era that causes us to assume that most people or nations are hypocritical. We conclude that the unseen and unknown are generally worse than the open and visible. It’s probably human nature combined with nationalism that causes us to lower our shields of distrust when our own national leaders discuss our nation. Our fearless political leaders continually describe our nation as “the greatest nation in the history of the world,” or as “the most free nation on earth.” Are they being truthful? Or are they rubbing us with a blob of feel-good salve? If they are speaking historically, they are telling us the truth. If referring to the present time, they are not.
According to Freedomexistence.org our exalted and extolled position as most free is not the case:
Rank Nation Overall Property Taxes Speech Ltd Govt Guns Drugs Corruption Inflation Business
1 Switzerland 75 90 68 94 69 60 35 87 84 80
2 Hong Kong 75 90 93 88 90 15 20 84 87 99
3 Chile 74 85 78 100 87 47 45 72 78 67
4 Canada 73 90 78 100 53 20 50 89 79 96
5 Australia 73 90 61 100 65 20 55 87 85 90
6 United States 73 85 68 100 55 80 15 71 77 91
7 New Zealand 72 95 65 100 49 20 30 93 85 100
8 Finland 71 90 65 100 26 40 45 92 81 95
9 Netherlands 71 90 51 100 37 25 85 88 83 82
10 Singapore 71 90 91 56 91 15 10 93 86 98
Based on the nine criteria listed in the chart above the United States is ranked sixth (6th) in overall freedom. Given the intensity with which the Administration is pursuing a Big Government agenda and the relative ineffectiveness of Congress, it is possible that we may have slipped even further down the chart. The last update was in June of this year and we’ve had an additional erosion of our liberty since then….including the just passed HR 1540 and S. 1867…an alarming restraint of our freedom and our rights. I’m not particularly disturbed that our politicians claim we are “most free” or “best” when we are not. Politicians frequently lie. I am distraught when those very same lying politicians unceasingly labor to make us less free. What they proclaim in the sunlight, they undo in the darkness. Sunshine patriots become freedom’s thieves after sundown…while we sleep and are unaware.
So why did I write this depressing column? We all agree that we have lost significant freedom in our lifetimes, but I wanted to illustrate just how far we have slipped. We continue to fall….perhaps into a free fall. This column was prompted by the GOP contest for presidential standard bearer. They discuss issues when they should be addressing principles and national character. They speak of cutting when they should eliminate unconstitutional agencies, departments and bureaus. They talk about too many regulations when they should defend liberty. Almost all of them appear to be somewhat cozy with the big statist government apparatus….after sundown. All of them that is….except one.
Comment: cearlwriting@hotmail.com
Tue. & Wed., 6-7:00pm, 1370 WSPD, Toledo www.wspd.com
Yes - It brings to mind this analogy.
ReplyDeleteLet's assume there are two political parties in hell. One led by Lucifer, the other, Beezlebub. The citizens of hell have concluded that it is a wicked and awful place. There is a general election coming, and they need an outsider to lead hell from its miseries, someone who is not part of the establishment - the status quo if you will.
One of their number has an epiphany, and gets in touch with Jesus to see if he'll run. To the surprise of many - as a merciful, selfless, and kind being, he agrees!
Only one problem. In hell, "He can't win"
Have we arrived in political hell?
Thank you for your daily writing efforts Charlie. I know it seems like you are a voice in the wilderness sometimes, but without your voice, and a few others like you, there would be none.
ReplyDeleteIFFTR!,
Jon