Showing posts with label leaders. Show all posts
Showing posts with label leaders. Show all posts

Monday, March 26, 2012

Potentates and Eunuchs


Potentates surrounded themselves with eunuchs for a number of reasons. One primary purpose was to assure that the “help” didn’t get too frisky with leader’s harem. Another reason was to maintain a bureaucracy and clerical or administrative staff that wouldn’t be distracted from their appointed duties by carnal desires. It seemed to be a mutually beneficial arrangement (unless you were a eunuch) because the system survived for centuries in various cultures throughout the globe. In today’s political environment there are some who would consider the ancient relationship to be barbaric or, at the very least, incredibly backward. But…politically speaking, nothing has changed despite the enlightened leadership of the 21st Century. Even here…in the United States of America … we have a modernized version of potentates and eunuchs.

Although the Constitution of the United States was designed to place the power of the nation in the hands of the people, we have evolved into a barely-recognizable distortion of the Framers’ original purpose. Numerous fiefdoms have emerged and each is the playground for various potentates and oligarchs. Congress, the Administration, Supreme Court and the countless bureaucracies all have become fertile ground for satraps and potentates. In historical times the eunuchs were key members of the bureaucracy, but in modern days the people have become political eunuchs as their power hungry petty rulers abuse them.  The historical role of eunuchs has been transformed into one of anatomically-deficient potentates. Every member of Congress, the House and the Senate, has carved out a little niche of power, and the members of their staffs and the committee staffs each has a little power fiefdom.

You may accuse me of hyperbole, but if you consider how local officials and their staffs jealously guard their turf and protocols, you can extrapolate the same attitudes (on steroids) to the state and federal apparatchiks. Though they may fill the roles formerly held by eunuchs, they have in the current situation developed into mini-potentates. If you as a taxpaying citizen seek to resolve an issue or receive an answer, you may be treated as if you were the lowliest of serfs….unworthy of the satrap’s undivided attention. You are often made to feel as if you are an unwelcome intruder who disrupts the important business of the bureaucracy. You may feel as if you’re the skunk at the picnic. Private enterprise has an institutional investment in pleasing the customer and making her feel welcome. When we encounter someone at a business who is less than helpful or rude, we may react by taking our business to a competitor. Government agencies have no competition, and when we find someone who is particularly polite or helpful, we are surprised.

Eunuchs were notoriously disdainful of those who were beneath their exalted stations. They generally reserved their best behavior for the potentates, their senior counselors and the royal family. So it is today as many of our public service eunuchs treat their ethically-challenged political masters fawningly while reluctantly performing their tasks for the commoners. Some might argue that the real eunuchs in American government are the elected officials. They appear to lack testosterone and courage while constantly dodging important decisions. The bureaucracy, on the other, has become emboldened and dictatorial because of the Congressional and legislative practices of passing enabling legislation. This type of legislative action merely lays out the framework and the overall purpose of the act and empowers the bureaucracy to “flesh it out” by writing rules, regulations and protocols. In essence the eunuchs call the shots, and the potentates fiddle and fuss. Their roles have been reversed.

So, in the final analysis our public servants who fill the roles of eunuchs behave as if they’re potentates, and the leadership while living the lifestyles of satraps actually have melted into unprincipled eunuchs. There is one glaring exception to this observation in today’s political landscape. Our President, Barrack Hussein Obama, has assumed the persona of a despotic potentate. He barks orders and expects others to jump in compliance. When they do not readily yield to his demands, he expresses his frustration and anger like one would expect from a tin-pot dictator. We can imagine him screaming “off with their heads” in another era. In reality, though, he represents the eunuch class much more effectively than he does the potentates. His quirkiness, anger and petulance are more fitting for a functionary than they are for a true leader. Perhaps he has earned the operative title of “The Eunuch Wannabe Tyrant.” I realize that belittling him in this manner may be a bit over the top because he has, indeed, generated and motivated enough activity that has radically damaged our republic. He has achievements that would be envied by any deranged potentate and gleefully enforced by any power-hungry state eunuch.

In a real sense Obama has become the perfectly merged embodiment of the eunuch and the potentate. He is an historical anachronism who has through his perfidy managed to undermine and dislodge critical elements of the social and political fabric of the nation. His petty nature combined with his grandiose socialist schemes has driven him to shake the basic foundations of our country. Those who preceded him prepared the stage, but His Eminent Potentate the Eunuch-in-Chief has dropped the curtain and is playing the leading role.

  

Wednesday, February 15, 2012

Greater Expectations


You are probably familiar with the fable about the Emperor’s New Clothes. If we were writing a story about today’s gallant knights who are running for office to save our nation, we would probably note that they’re wearing tin-foil armor. They are clothed with the fragile protection of expediency that they expect us to assume is principle.  Every candidate from every party or movement is to some degree a flawed warrior. For those of us who must choose our standard bearer, we are faced with the unenviable task of choosing a lesser leader. When we consider whom to choose, we should reflect about what our previous choices have yielded so that we do not compound one error with another. We do not require a leader who wears the faulty armor. We must have leaders who have principled minds and courageous hearts.

While at the Conservative Political Action Conference (CPAC) last week, I was struck by the dichotomy of passions that I witnessed. On the one hand supporters of various candidates and issues were vociferously promoting their “new best thing,” while on the other hand the overall tenor of the event was tenuous and somewhat subdued. For some Mitt was the best choice, and for others Newt or Rick was the obvious pick. Dr. Paul’s support was somewhat muted because of many liberty-oriented groups decisions not to participate in this year’s cattle call.


Is that all there is? Is this the best that America has to offer? Are Mitt, Newt, Rick, or Barrack the true guardians of liberty that our Framers had hoped would succeed them? Are Mitch McConnell and John Boehner the most virtuous and courageous people available to lead the Senate and the House of Representatives respectively? Yes, each of them is flawed….dangerously so, but those of us who are dissatisfied with them and their positions, policies or practices have not explicitly identified our criteria for leadership.

While we may choose to support the most electable or the best option available, we are admitting that our standards have sunk to the point of non-existence. Even in our local or congressional races we celebrate people whom we believe are better than the incumbent but are sorely deficient in principle, integrity and honor. Although we may whine about the paucity of principle among our candidates, we ignore the ones who are steadfast and solid because we perceive that they cannot win. That observation is true because it is a self-fulfilling prophecy. If we settle for lesser candidates in order to win, we shall always lose in the longer run. By promoting or electing lesser candidates what do we win? Perhaps a little more time before the Republic implodes, but not much else. We allow them to chisel away at our liberty and deny us the use of our property bit by bit.

Times have changed, Patriots. When we yet enjoyed our inalienable G_d-given rights and our Constitutionally-protected freedom, we could occasionally afford to elect an unprincipled charlatan or two. Today, however, the landscape has been altered. Each and every day we encounter another abuse from our government, and we cry for men and women of courage and principle to stand up and say “No More!” We must exercise our “greater expectations.” Close enough is not good enough any longer. Electable but seriously-flawed candidates will continue the destruction of our Republic and the future for our progeny. Greater expectations must be the order of the day and all our subsequent days. We have been identified as an exceptional people and nation. An exceptional people does NOT elect inadequate leaders just because they call us exceptional. An exceptional people insist that leaders be principled, honorable and honest. Maybe we should demand the “NOTA” (none of the above) option in our elections until we begin to attract the quality of candidates who are worthy of the Founders’ and Framers’ visions. We should exercise our greater expectations.

We have recently celebrated the 200th anniversary of Charles Dickens’ birth (b. 7 February 1812), our present constitutional republic has been in effect for 225 years, and our Declaration of Independence was issued some 236 years ago. Our greater expectations have been submerged in expediency and pragmatism as we march toward our tyrannical nirvana. Our liberty has been forfeited on the altar of electability and we have selected or elected leaders who compromise away our heritage….while we allow it. I am painfully aware that no one is perfect. I also know that the perfect candidate cannot satisfy the expectations of 312 million people. If we are convinced, however that a candidate is resolutely committed to identifiable principles then we can choose to support or reject that candidacy for legitimate reasons. Without a clear exposition of principles…we are blindfolded in the dark while trying to detect the least objectionable contestant.  

Truly I do understand the terrible fix that we’re in, but we’ve got to cure ourselves of the self-defeating strategy of falling for the first girl that shows some thigh or the buff guy with the six-pack abs. We must demand more of our candidates….more depth, more principle, more integrity and more courage. Glitter and almost-good enough does not cut it. The John Boehner’s of the world are absolutely undermining our liberty and our nation. Obama and his Marxist clan are destroying our nation. Unprincipled Republicans are allowing it. We must not be complicit. We must be insistent and consistent.